Latest News

RSS Link

Initial Ruling Made In A Day To Remember’s Lawsuit Against Victory Records

An initial ruling has been issued in A Day To Remember‘s long-running lawsuit against their record label Victory Records and it sways in the bands favor. The band had originally filed suit against Victory in May of 2011 alleging breach of contract, disputed ownership of the bands copyrighted works and more.

A Day To Remember‘s camp themselves spoke of the new initial ruling—which will allow them to release their new album “Common Courtesy” independently—with the below statement:

“A federal judge today ruled that A Day To Remember are free to release their new album Common Courtesy without Victory Records. In an Order issued earlier today, U.S District Court Judge John Z. Lee denied Victory Records‘ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction in which Victory had sought to block the band from releasing this new album without Victory‘s involvement.”

“In May of 2011 we joined the long list of bands that have filed suit against Victory Records. Although our case is still ongoing, we are very pleased with the judge’s decision to allow us to release our next record. The only thing that has mattered to us while dealing with this lawsuit was getting new music to our fans. We are finally going to do that on October 8th and we couldn’t be more excited!”

Victory Records‘ attorney Robert S. Meloni gave the following statement to Absolutepunk.net on the proceedings:

“While Victory is disappointed with the ruling, and disagrees with the court’s conclusions, it comes as no surprise. Courts rarely grant negative injunctions of this nature, but the circumstances of this case presented a unique opportunity for such a ruling.

Having said that, in denying Victory‘s motion, the court’s reasoning actually contained silver linings that significantly favored Victory. First, the court held that it supports Victory‘s argument about the construction of the recording contract – that ADTR is still obligated to deliver two more albums to Victory – “at last equally, if not more so, than that offered by ADTR.” That is the core issue in this case and the only one that really matters in the end, so Victory is heartened that the court agreed with Victory‘s position on that core issue.

Also, the sole basis for the court’s denial of the injunction was that Victory would not suffer “irreparable harm” that could not be compensated by money damages if the album were to be self released, in that it has ample evidence to prove its damages against the band (in the form of lost profits if ADTR does proceed to self release Common Courtesy).

That is, even if the band self releases it, Victory is likely to be awarded any profits the band makes on that album, plus additional lost profits suffered by Victory based on the fact that Victory would undeniably do a far better job at marketing the album had Victory released it, which is what Victory is known for and is the reason why ADTR signed with Victory in the first place. In sum, it is a “successful” defeat in a way, and one which Victory welcomed because of the manner in which the Court rendered its opinion.

This case will proceed to trial, and Victory is looking forward to the opportunity to vindicate the baseless claims filed by ADTR.

-Robert S. Meloni

Common Courtesy” will be digitally released by the band independently through their official website, ADTR.com, on October 08th.

Comments

  • adamonfire

    They were saying the courts gave them the go-ahead last night at the show – the new songs were pretty damn good live, really heavy stuff. Their stage production is way beyond what you’d think they’d have… great show.

  • revstevo

    so did Victory pretty much just admit they’re assholes?

  • adamonfire

    So today Victory had a booth set-up at the venue handing out bags with samplers and a catalog – I don’t remember them being there yesterday, which is strange because that is when their artist actually played.