Latest News

RSS Link

Lamb Of God’s Randy Blythe Speaks On SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) & More

Lamb Of God frontman Randy Blythe has been speaking his mind on SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) (see Wikipedia.org or Americancensorship.org). Engaging in some heated conversation with users through his Twitter, he initially touched on the subject with the following missive:

“Ok, lemme ask y’all this- who are the two major players in this SOPA debate & why? (hint- it ain’t really the government)”

He later continued:

“The reason I ask you this stuff is to make you think about what is REALLY happening here. I hear a lot of knee jerk reactions from ill-informed people saying “this is just a way for the govt to restrict free speech”- BULLSHIT. This is a corporate battle being fought at a judicial level by PAID LOBBYISTS- neither corporate side REALLY CARES for A) artists/creators rights or B) free speech rights.

Get the fuck outta here. The RIAA hasn’t done much for me lately. People worry about YouTube getting shutdown, as if it is an altruistic creative expression outlet. WHO OWNS YOUTUBE? And WHY does YouTube exist? It ain’t for you to develop your creative side.”

“I don’t think SOPA should be allowed to pass as written. Terms are too broad & open. But there is a corporate race occurring right now that you have little control over. This is all about funding, people. Do a little research & you’ll see where the dollars are coming from that fund some of these supposed “free speech advocacy” groups. It ain’t from idealist libertarians. It’s ALL CORPORATE. ALL OF IT.

Let’s see who has the juice and cash flow- the FEW PEOPLE making real money off of providing Internet & computer hardware, or the big wigs at the media conglomerates. Y’all’s pissant voices (that includes mine too) will have VERY LITTLE to do with the outcome of the SOPA debate. BE AWARE!”

The topic later shifted to Metalllica drummer Lars Ulrich‘s role in the Napster controversy back in 2000. In case you don’t recall, Metallica (and other artists) filed suit against the then nascent file sharing service after finding their material circulating on it.

Here’s what Blythe had to say on the matter to Twitter user Srhdgaf586:

“Lars Ulrich was the face that took a beating. Lars was RIGHT. The whole Napster thing was a FACADE. Napster was NOT an idealistic kid trying to ensure “free music”- IT WAS A CORPORATION. And the heads at Napster up until the 11th hour were in negotiations with the heads of who?- the five major music media conglomerates to SELL Napster for 2 billion so it could become A PAY SERVICE.

The media conglomerates fucked up by choosing Lars as the face of their battle, even though he was RIGHT and was upset about a track leaking THAT WASN’T RELEASED YET- Metallica let people record shows and trade FOR YEARS when most other bands WOULD NOT. He is demonized for doing what is RIGHT- trying to control WHEN AND WHERE HIS FUCKING MUSIC IS RELEASED.

If the folks at Sony & Warner & EMI had chosen a struggling artist to be their face, this whole thing would have been framed in an entirely different way. It’s all BULLSHIT. WAKE UP. Napster didn’t care about fans, the major media outlets don’t care about fans- IT’S ALL ABOUT MONEY. MONEY MONEY MONEY. CORPERATE DOLLARS. That’s the ONLY thing SOPA is about. Don’t be fooled. Approximately 1/4 of all Internet traffic is the exchange of pirated material.

Tell me who loses and who gains from that material being exchanged and then you’ll have a VERY SIMPLE answer to what this whole SOPA thing is about. #fuckingtruthinyourface”

A further conversation, once again with Twitter user Srhdgaf586 then followed and can be read below:

“I just FUCKING HATE IT when people refer to the stand Lars Ulrich took as greedy rockstar shit, cuz that WASN’T what it was all about. If someone had an unmixed, not completed version of “Resolution” and they threw that up on the Internet right now, I would sue the fuckers for EVERYTHING GODDAMNED PENNY they had and then some.

What I would say would make Lars Ulrich look like Mother-fucking-Theresa. People have NO RIGHT to take an unfinished I create & distribute it IN ANY WAY without my knowledge.

If someone does that, they are not only A) STEALING FROM ME, they are B) FUCKING WITH MY CREATIVE PROCESS. I will fucking fight tooth & nail to PROTECT WHAT I DO. ITS MINE. If I never want to release a track- I won’t. Some asshole shouldn’t be allowed to make DECISIONS FOR ME. Someone made a decision FOR Metallica without their consent. Why is Lars demonizes for being PISSED over that?

It’s like taking someone’s raw journal entry they were going to turn into a newspaper story & publishing it. It’s WRONG. If I was going to sue people whole stole my music, I would be DROWNING in litigation right now. It would be impossible.

But I SURE AS FUCK would sue ANYONE that released an UNFINISHED lamb of god product, one that I was NOT ready for the world to hear. I might go break their fucking knee caps too. Fuck ANYONE that can’t grasp that concept. DONT fuck with MY MUSIC.”

Being that the aforementioned discussions took place on Blythe‘s Twitter, some more context to his opinions and the like can be found at the above-mentioned link.

COMMENTS

25
    • avatar
    • JohnnyWetTowel     December 27, 2011 at 2:56 pm

      It’s all about the corporations AND the FUCKING CAPITALISATION!

      I even re-read it all, just in case the difference between the lower-case and upper-case was some sort of code, like “Lars Ulrich really is a greedy rockstar shit”…

      …it wasn’t .

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • avatar

    • I think he’s at least right about the releases of the products that aren’t final. If a LOG or Metallica song that’s unfinished sees the light of day to the public when it wasn’t intended to be, that could be a damnation on either band as it’s not what they intended on the audience to hear. It was just a step in the creative process and was never intended for the the masses to consume.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • avatar
    • Donnie Narco     December 27, 2011 at 4:00 pm

      i’m pretty sure the napster incident isn’t the only gripe most people have with lars… it’s just the most famous one out of the hundred. (i rounded down)

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • avatar
    • HonoluluBlueBalls     December 27, 2011 at 7:17 pm

      Blythe doesn’t support SOPA and he has no idea why. He should be the SOPA posterboy. It’s legislation that makes it a felony to stream copyrighted material. It also gives the government the ability to block the public’s access to any website in violation of the act. He doesn’t want people fucking with his music without his permission and SOPA will allow the feds to put someone in prison for five years and slap seven figure fines on them for doing so. Obviously the record labels, film studios and software companies are all for it while websites that live and die by the streaming of copyrighted material like youtube are against it. Just because corporations couldn’t give a shit about art (not a revelation) doesn’t mean the artists won’t benefit from decreased piracy. Just because it’s a corporate battle doesn’t mean that the free-speech advocates don’t have valid concerns, considering SOPA will fight to end piracy at the expense of a “free and open web”.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • avatar
    • dropdeaddalton     December 27, 2011 at 9:56 pm

      you know what, piracy wouldnt be such a big deal if asshole musicians and film makers wouldnt charge so damn much for their shit, the content is virtually worth nothing (when i listen to any music or watch any movie i dont get anything out of it), so the only thing that costs is the hardware (the disc). The content doesnt make a 75 cent disc worth twenty bucks.. thats the real step to stoping online piracy and it has much less protesters. but assholes in the entertainment industry think their shit is worth money. Idiots!! you would make a lot more money if you actually made your music more affordable. the reason there is so much piracy is because of the price people would be more willing to buy your media if it was a resonable price, you are fucking us out of our money with the outrageous prices, so whats the problem when you get fucked out of yours???

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
      • avatar

      • wait a minute here….what do you mean if you watch a movie or listen to a cd, you dont get anything out of it? you get ENTERTAINED, you jackass. The only thing that costs is the hardware? What about the thousands or millions of dollars (in the case of movies) that goes into producing anything? You seriously have some narrow-minded issues when it comes to this debate.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
        • avatar
        • Aggroculture     December 28, 2011 at 5:11 am

          Yes but he’s right about music being overpriced. NOW the music industry is finally learning that people will pay $5-10 for an album, not the $20 they still try to charge in stores.

          Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • avatar
    • dropdeaddalton     December 27, 2011 at 10:05 pm

      I am an artist as well, i know what it is like to create something beautiful and artistic i know what it is like for someone to steal it and give it away or take credit for it, but you know what, i dont cause i big shitstain over it, if you really love what you do, then it isn’t about how much money you make. If you love music and you love art then whats the problem? most of the artists that complain about this is the artists that already have enough money to quit and be set for life, and even help you children most of theirs.. so why be so damn greedy and want more money when you dont even know what your going to do with the money you already have, theres people in this world that dont even have a pile of hay to sleep on and are happy as can be with their live, yet the people who have everything they ever wanted are sitting here complaining and whining about the life they have because a couple dollars got taken from them, or they want more money.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • avatar

    • SOPA is about any corperation with another money and a small reason to be able to pull your domain. No warrant, no nothing.

      Wook should be afraid considering the amount of youtube stuff that gets posted here (and some of it user uploaded which may or may not be legit) – and which could be grounds enough for these motherfuckers to pull theprp.com. Example: Someone posts a link to a megaupload file which happens to be copyright material and bang, site pulled, domain seized and wook gets raped.

      Be afraid, be very afraid. There is a bigger picture here and Randy should read between the fuckin lines before he gets on his soap box.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • avatar

    • Just my two cents, but if someone uploads an unfinished LoG song, shouldn’t Blythe be bitching at himself? Wouldn’t that mean that some friend or cohort of the band got his hands on their material and is letting it loose on the world? Stop hanging out with ass kissers that pander to your ego and steal your music from under your nose. Where’s the accountability on his end?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply


« Back View All Recent Comments »